Last modified: 2008-08-09 by jonathan dixon
Keywords: new zealand | governor | governor-general | lieutenant-governor | garland | fern | stars: 4 | star: 5 points (red) |
Links: FOTW homepage |
search |
disclaimer and copyright |
write us |
mirrors
See also:
by Blas Delgado Ortiz, 9 May 2001
The Queen's Personal Flag for New Zealand symbolises the fact that Queen Elizabeth
II is The Queen of New Zealand. Adopted in 1962, it is flown only by Her Majesty
when in New Zealand. The Flag is the shield design of the New Zealand Coat
of Arms in the form of an oblong or square. Superimposed in the centre is a
dark blue roundel bearing a Roman "E" surmounted by a Royal Crown
within a garland of roses all in gold. The central device is from The Queen's
Personal Flag which is frequently used by Her Majesty in relation to Her position
as head of the Commonwealth.
quote from New
Zealand’s Ministry for Culture and Heritage flag page, contributed by Rob Raeside, 7 March 2002
Link and quote updated by Colin Dobson, 11 November 2006
BBC1 television news reported tonight the ceremony held today at which the new New Zealand Memorial, entitled Southern Stand, was unveiled by The Queen at Hyde Park Corner, London. At this ceremony, but not shown in the article referenced below, were flown on three separate freestanding flagpoles the Union Flag, the flag of New Zealand and the flag of The Queen of New Zealand.
This is an example of The Queen of New Zealand's flag being used outside that country and directly contradicts the information taken from the Ministry for Culture and Heritage web site.
Sources:
http://masseynews.massey.ac.nz/2006/Massey_News/issue-20/stories/02-20-06.html
[No longer active], stated to be last updated 03 November 2006 and consulted 11 November 20061:2
by Željko Heimer, crest image by Graham Bartram, 17 March
2001
Blue flags with the royal crest [a lion standing on a crown] and scroll(s) were introduced for Governor-Generals in the 1930s. It is usually said that they were intended to show that, following the Balfour Declaration of 1926, Governor-Generals no longer represented the British Government, but had become representatives of the British monarch. However it is possible that this was not the original reason for introducing the flags.
The haphazard way in which the flags were
introduced does support the idea that, although they did come to symbolise the new
constitutional relationship between Britain and the Dominions, this was not their original
purpose. Had it been, all four flags would surely have been introduced at the same time ?
Perhaps on the 1st January 1932, after the British Parliament had given the Balfour
Declaration legal standing by enacting the Statute of Westminster on 12th December 1931.
Instead, the flag was already in use in South Africa (January 1931) and Canada (April 1931), but was not used in New Zealand until April 1935. The Governor-General, Lord
Bledisloe, had refused to fly the flag, and it remained in store until he was succeeded by
Lord Galway. In Australia the Prime Minister, James Scullin, did not favour the change,
and the flag was not adopted there until July 1936.
[Source: National Archives (PRO) DO 35/253/5, DO 35/628/3, DO 117/100]
David Prothero, 12 April 2005
A different image of the Governor-General's flag in
New Zealand is shown here.
Valentin Poposki, 5 August 2006
According to a government website, small renderings of the flag (like on a car flag) are done only in gold.
Marc Pasquin, 5 August 2006
This version of the flag (with a very poor and inaccurate rendering of the Royal Crest) is depicted in Album des Pavillons [pay00],
however and therefore there is little doubt that this is the correct
verion currently in use.
Martin Grieve, 6 August 2006
I am still not convinced about the use of a gold-only flag. The site
actually says "it is not possible to accurately represent the colours of
the Governor-General's flag on an image of this size. In these cases, the
detailing of the flag is shown only in gold." I read that as referring to
images of the flag, rather than car flags or anything like that, although
I suppose it could have that meaning. At the very least, the use of gold
only is only in some cases.
Jonathan Dixon, 7 August 2006
1:2
by Željko Heimer, 20 March 2001
Many years ago I read (sorry, but I don`t remember where I read this) that
inscription on the ribbon was: "DOMINION OF NEW ZEALAND"
Victor Lomantsov, 18 March 2001
During this time, New Zeland was a dependency of
New South Wales.
James Dignan, 7 July 1997
1:2
by Martin Grieve, 2 January 2005
New flags were announced in the New Zealand Gazette, Saturday 23rd October 1869, including a Jack with "four five pointed white stars on the red ground of the St George's Cross".
The jack is a misinterpretation of the Order in Council of 7th August 1869; "... Governors
...administering the Governments of British Colonies and Dependencies be authorised to fly
the Union Jack, with the Arms or Badge of the Colony emblazoned in the centre thereof."
It seems to have been assumed that since the four stars of the Southern Cross on the Blue
Ensign were spread across the whole fly and not confined to a small circle, the stars on
the Union Jack should be similarly spread.
David Prothero, 2 January 2005
1:2
by António Martins and Jaume Ollé, 25 March 2000
The mistake in the Jack [of 1869] was not corrected until 29th October 1874 when it was announced,
"... that the seal or badge to be worn in the Union Jack used by the Governor of New
Zealand when embarked in any boat or other vessel shall be the Southern Cross as
represented by four five-pointed red stars emblazoned on the white shield aforesaid, and
the monogram NZ in red letters in the centre of the Southern Cross."
David Prothero, 2 January 2005
1:2
by António Martins, fern garland provided by Phil Nelson,
16 March 2000
I recently read an interesting article on New Zealand flags (which seemed to come from a post-1962 encyclopedia - perhaps the "New Zealand Encyclopedia"), which included a small bit on vice-regal flags. This source seems to imply that in 1874, as a result of the actions of (Governor?) Sir James Fergusson, (and in accordance with the directions emanating from the Admiralty in 1869), it was decided [my comments in square brackets]:
the badge to be worn in the Union Jack used by the Governor of New Zealand when embarked in any vessel {shall be the Southern Cross as represented by four five-pointed red stars emblasoned on a white shield, with the monogram "NZ" in red letters in the centre of the Southern Cross}. Succeeding Governors found it convenient to use this flag on shore [as in the rest of the Empire] and it became accepted as the official vice-regal flag. In 1907, following New Zealand's promotion from "colony" to "dominion", New Zealand ministers asked that the garland of laurels should be replaced by one of fern leaves, [which, of course, is one of NZ's national symbols]. With this alteration, the flag continued to be used by successive Governors until about 1935. In January 1931, a new vice-regal flag was designed... [the Royal Crest in Gold, with the name of the Dominion in gold beneath, all on a blue field]. As neither Lord Bledisloe, [whom I assume was Governor in the early 1930s], nor his minsters were sympathetic to the change, the flag was not favoured until after Lord Galway's arrival [whom I assume became Governor General of NZ c.1935].Glen Hodgins, 23 Feburary 1999
The first official flag with fern leaves appeared in about
1908. In a letter dated 5th January 1908 the Governor-General
of NZ requested that the garland around the badge on his flag
be changed from the usual green laurel leaves, which had been
used until then, to a garland of fern leaves, and referred to
the garland of maple leaves surrounding the badge on the flag
of the Gov.-Gen. of Canada as
a precedent. This was no problem since the original regulations
only stipulated that the device on the flags of Governors should
be surrounded by a green garland without specifying the type of
leaves. (Source: PRO file, ADM 116/1072)
David Prothero, 9 September 1998